Date: 2005-06-28 08:19 pm (UTC)
I'm a big fan of the C-750. I don't use the extra features very often because my pictures usually turn out very nice at the standard settings. It has an excellent zoom, a nice interface, and it's simple enough that even my dad (who I don't think has actually owned his own camera since the days when you had to buy separate flash cubes) was able to take a lot of good pictures the one time I had him use it.

It uses batteries (4 AA) really efficiently. You know how many pictures I can take if I want to. Last year in California, I took pictures to a near-ScaperCon degree and while I recharged the batteries every day, I didn't need to. And that's with using the view screen. I don't know what the battery pack will be like, though.

I have a 256 MB xD card and I can get almost 300 pictures on there at the highest JPEG setting (2288 x 1712). And if I don't go crazy with the pictures, I have plenty of room for recording QT movies if I want.

And, personally, I swear by Olympus. Their cameras have served both me and Natalie well.

So if this is just a slight upgrade from the C-750, I'd be sold on it except for maybe the battery pack. I don't know enough about that to say anything.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 28th, 2025 08:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios