Most of the ones I saw said "aperture - f2.8-3.2" or something pathetic like that. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong cameras...
I think you might be. I don't remember seeing anything so pathetic as that on the ones you could change...
Yeah, I think you have to buy whole new lens attachments, and... bleh.
I think you might be able to force more depth of field if you bought a larger telephoto lens, but I could have the math wrong on that. Anyway, those are $150. (Well, the 8x one I was looking at when I was contemplating the Canon is, anyway. Plus it's heavier and harder to handle.)
Hmmmm, Nikon... admittedly, haven't given them much attention...
no subject
Date: 2005-08-20 04:29 pm (UTC)I think you might be. I don't remember seeing anything so pathetic as that on the ones you could change...
Yeah, I think you have to buy whole new lens attachments, and... bleh.
I think you might be able to force more depth of field if you bought a larger telephoto lens, but I could have the math wrong on that. Anyway, those are $150. (Well, the 8x one I was looking at when I was contemplating the Canon is, anyway. Plus it's heavier and harder to handle.)
Hmmmm, Nikon... admittedly, haven't given them much attention...
They make nice cameras.
Oi, I feel your aquarium grump.
Arrrrggghhhh.