I'm not sure when in the process Cavil attemped to destroy everything Daniel-related, so I don't know who might've gotten away...
I could have sworn Ellen said that he poisoned "the copies," which is why I was assuming that Daniel would have to have been the only one that was viable, at least in his original form.
Yeah, but it didn't detect the Fabulous Four, either.
Well, here's a question--did they ever get round to testing everyone? Was it ever implied? I certainly don't recall Gaius running some big Test-Everyone-Right-Now deal, and since the implication of the Boomer incident is that he couldn't be trusted to report the results accurately, I sort of suspect that they just dropped that plotline post-Boomer.
I think she was trying to be oh-so-forgiving, maybe? To pull him back into the fold?
Yeah, maybe. Though on further thought, it's more difficult to believe that Cavil didn't bring it up just to get under her skin.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-02-18 03:25 pm (UTC)I could have sworn Ellen said that he poisoned "the copies," which is why I was assuming that Daniel would have to have been the only one that was viable, at least in his original form.
Yeah, but it didn't detect the Fabulous Four, either.
Well, here's a question--did they ever get round to testing everyone? Was it ever implied? I certainly don't recall Gaius running some big Test-Everyone-Right-Now deal, and since the implication of the Boomer incident is that he couldn't be trusted to report the results accurately, I sort of suspect that they just dropped that plotline post-Boomer.
I think she was trying to be oh-so-forgiving, maybe? To pull him back into the fold?
Yeah, maybe. Though on further thought, it's more difficult to believe that Cavil didn't bring it up just to get under her skin.