Literally, a post

[icepixie]

I've had it. I think it's time to retire the word "literally" from the English language, seeing as how nobody--not journalists, not novelists, not message board posters--can use it correctly anymore. 99% of the time I see it, the writer either means "figuratively," or else is using the term to add wholly-unnecessary emphasis (i.e., "The car was literally red"). It's time to give up and move on.

*

In happier news, I finally got my hair cut today. I usually get it cut every three or four months, getting around two inches cut off each time. It's been about six weeks since it needed to be cut, so I had the lady chop off three and a half inches. Ahhhh, freedom. I hate it when my hair touches my shoulders; it feels like it's eating my neck, and the longer it gets, the more I fidget with it, and that drives me up a wall, which makes me play with it even more, and it's a vicious cycle.

Comments

[thiswaltz.livejournal.com]

agreed, heartily agreed! I would also wish the word 'random' to be stricken from the modern vernacular, both words are so frequently and so wrongly used. And that horrific phrase "very unique" should be entirely disallowed.

oh, hey, someone else that gets claustrophobic from their hair. I don't get as bugged as I used to, but when I was little both my hair and my sock seams would drive me to distraction.

[icepixie]

I would also wish the word 'random' to be stricken from the modern vernacular

I could get behind this.

And that horrific phrase "very unique" should be entirely disallowed.

Owwww. Yes.

when I was little both my hair and my sock seams would drive me to distraction.

OMG! Sock seams still bother me, and it used to be much worse. They must be on top of my toes, not on the bottom or right at the end of the toenail. And even then they can still get annoying.