More books
Jun. 27th, 2008 08:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Several years ago, I read this, nodding my head along with much of it. However, I always thought that maybe The Shipping News was getting a bad rap in that article, and perhaps it has some good points. (Mostly because it's set in Newfoundland, and I apparently have a weakness for Canada [c.f. S&A, dS, etc.].)
Ohhhhhhh, no. No, every word in that article concerning this book is true. I tried to read it this week, and got about thirty pages in before I had to give up. It was either that or throw it across the room. During those thirty pages, my chief thought was, "I'd like to buy a verb, please." Proulx can't seem to go more than a paragraph without a sentence fragment: "A great damp loaf of a body." "Then, at a meeting, Petal Bear. Thin, moist, hot." "Growls from his shirt." Lord. Fragments are fine in small doses, but not all the time. Then they become less for effect than for self-conscious pretention.
On the other hand, Peter Ho Davies's The Welsh Girl, which I also read last week, is wonderful. It's set in Wales, during WWII. It involves a German POW, a Welsh girl (obviously), a German expat kinda-Jew (he has complicated feelings about his identity), and an English child evacuee, among other people. There is a not-exactly love story, an escape from a prison camp, and an unsuccessful interrogation of Rudolf Hess, among other things. It's hard to describe, but it's very good nonetheless.
Now I am on to Ivanhoe, for real this time, because it's part of the syllabus for the coming semester's 19th Century BritLit course. I haven't read a book while underlining passages and annotating them in over two years. Strange how quickly it comes back.
*
In completely different news, go listen to this, because it's purty.
Ohhhhhhh, no. No, every word in that article concerning this book is true. I tried to read it this week, and got about thirty pages in before I had to give up. It was either that or throw it across the room. During those thirty pages, my chief thought was, "I'd like to buy a verb, please." Proulx can't seem to go more than a paragraph without a sentence fragment: "A great damp loaf of a body." "Then, at a meeting, Petal Bear. Thin, moist, hot." "Growls from his shirt." Lord. Fragments are fine in small doses, but not all the time. Then they become less for effect than for self-conscious pretention.
On the other hand, Peter Ho Davies's The Welsh Girl, which I also read last week, is wonderful. It's set in Wales, during WWII. It involves a German POW, a Welsh girl (obviously), a German expat kinda-Jew (he has complicated feelings about his identity), and an English child evacuee, among other people. There is a not-exactly love story, an escape from a prison camp, and an unsuccessful interrogation of Rudolf Hess, among other things. It's hard to describe, but it's very good nonetheless.
Now I am on to Ivanhoe, for real this time, because it's part of the syllabus for the coming semester's 19th Century BritLit course. I haven't read a book while underlining passages and annotating them in over two years. Strange how quickly it comes back.
*
In completely different news, go listen to this, because it's purty.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 01:51 am (UTC)Funnily enough, I just started trying to read All the Pretty Horses today on my lunch break, and... yeah. I thought it was just me, but so far it reads like a bad Faulkner parody. Myers actually picked out a lot of the very sentences that made me stop and go, "What the fuck? That's not even good writing!"
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 05:30 am (UTC)My usual tactic is to stay away from anything nominated for the Pulitzer/Booker/PEN/etc. prizes, which cuts down on much of the crap. :D
no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-28 11:21 pm (UTC)I do have a preference for awards within the sci-fi community, though: I generally like Hugo award-winners far more than Nebula award-winners. I think the key there is that the Nebulas are chosen by published authors, and the Hugos by any fan who cares to pay the money to join WorldCon and have a vote. (At least, I think that's how it works. I know it's chosen by fans, anyway.) That said, I do have an issue with the way the Hugos always seem to be awarded to the same set of authors year after year, even if many of them are my favorites. (I guess that's what comes a voting committe made up of about 700 random fans...) But a lot of the Nebula-winners...bleh.