Comps, all grown up
Aug. 26th, 2008 08:09 pmI just went through the reading list for the MA comprehensive exam (hahaha, and I thought Kenyon's was bad...this one's five pages long) making checkmarks by the texts I've already read. It's kind of amusing, really--there's some, but not a lot, of coverage of Old/Middle English...a ton of checkmarks for the Romantics and Victorians...somewhat fewer for early American...fewer yet, but still an almost respectable amount, for the eighteenth century...a thick flurry for all of the twentieth century...and a GIANT GAPING HOLE for the seventeenth century. BECAUSE I HATE THEM.
*sigh* I guess I know what I'll be spending this year reading. Yuck.
*sigh* I guess I know what I'll be spending this year reading. Yuck.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-27 05:43 pm (UTC)That's like fantasy, gut'n'gore and Sex and the City in one handy package!
no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 01:51 am (UTC)It's also ALL ABOUT CHRISTIANITY, of which I am clueless. I miss at least 3/4ths of the allusions all of those folks are making, and it would take years to steep myself in the biblical references I need to really Get It. So I do my best to ignore it.
no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 05:57 pm (UTC)Of course, there might not be annotated editions of the more obscure 17th-century authors, but the standard writers of the canon should have been covered. So, why do all the work yourself when diligent generations of scholars have already done it for you? :)
no subject
Date: 2008-08-28 08:30 pm (UTC)Oh, believe me, when I read them, I'm all about the footnotes. I just feel that there's meaning there for believers that there isn't for me, you know? I'll take my Victorians and Moderns any day.