*races across the finish line*
Nov. 30th, 2008 08:01 pmThe paper is done! DONE, I SAY! Well, it still needs about four to six hours of revision, but I need a few days away from it before I can do that, so that's for later this week.
It weighs in at a few lines less than twenty-one pages. My works cited page is in fact two pages, including seventeen works cited and three more works consulted, because one cannot write a paper on the Henriad without in some way acknowledging Greenblatt's "Invisible Bullets," one just can't.
ETA: I just realized how much this reads like a birth announcement. Hmm.
It weighs in at a few lines less than twenty-one pages. My works cited page is in fact two pages, including seventeen works cited and three more works consulted, because one cannot write a paper on the Henriad without in some way acknowledging Greenblatt's "Invisible Bullets," one just can't.
ETA: I just realized how much this reads like a birth announcement. Hmm.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 02:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 01:43 am (UTC)*dons silly hat*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 02:08 am (UTC)*also dons silly and and dances around*
no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 03:45 am (UTC)I'm always impressed by people who finish papers early enough to edit them. I still can't. ^_^
no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 11:14 pm (UTC)Well, I can't turn this in yet, because half of my footnotes still trail off into a line of asterisks. Come to think of it, at least one of my paragraphs does as well. :D
And if you're getting A's on all your papers and whatnot, I rather doubt you have to worry about finishing them in time to edit...
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 04:12 am (UTC)But: ahhh, footnotes. How I've missed you.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:34 pm (UTC)This is my secret fear. And it's why I give myself time to edit.
But: ahhh, footnotes. How I've missed you.
It's weird to be in a position to actually use them when writing an MLA-style paper. I've finally hit the point in my academic career where I can have things like, "[xyz] [page numbers] has an interesting discussion of [something related to what I'm discussing but which I don't want to quote]," or "For a critical overview of [whatever issue I'm touching on], see [XYZ]."
no subject
Date: 2008-12-03 09:25 pm (UTC)It's nice, isn't it? (I'm hitting a new low by footnoting critical discussions of Whitman in a music paper.)
no subject
Date: 2008-12-03 11:56 pm (UTC)Personally, I would call that a high.
no subject
Date: 2008-12-04 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-01 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-12-02 03:44 am (UTC)