icepixie: ([B5] Universe made manifest)
[personal profile] icepixie
I have disparaged the Nashville McKay's in the past for not being as large as the Knoxville one and for not having as extensive a sci-fi section. After today, I don't think I can do that any more.

I recently read S.L. Viehl's Stardoc, not realizing it was the beginning of a series. Of course, I was totally hooked, and needed to find the rest of the books, now numbering ten, with three more set in the same universe featuring different characters. I found all but the latest two of the main series, and the first of the other series. I was shocked. I also bought them all, along with five other books. The Stars Down Under looks particularly good (although I just realized it's a sequel to another book, Outback Stars...which my branch of the library has! Woot!), as does Waterland. In addition, yesterday I ran across mention of Elizabeth Peters's Amelia Peabody series, and...this looks like something I need to read, so I requested the first one from the library. I'm hoping for a mixture of The Mummy and Possession or The Historian. (Which I coincidentally bought today. Pristine hardcover edition. FOR A DOLLAR. Oh, McKay bargain shelves, I love you so.)

Plus I am rereading If on a winter's night a traveler, for no particular reason beyond the fact that it's been four years and a graduate degree since the last time I read it. Calvino, I adore you too.

Uhhhh, yeah, so one day I'm going to get back to my B5 rewatch, but it may be a little while.

Date: 2010-08-29 02:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowdycamels.livejournal.com
I tried reading Waterland several years ago (perhaps around the time I took McMullen's class? Maybe even on her recommendation?) and was severely underwhelmed. The setting is interesting, but the plot devolves pretty quickly into Pre-Teen SexyTiems, and... blergh. Also, I vaguely remember some Freud in there. I'm not sure I ever bothered to finish the book. The language was fairly pretty here and there, but... meh. Maybe you'll be better than me at finding a redeeming quality to it.

Date: 2010-08-29 05:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowdycamels.livejournal.com
Yeah, the first thing about the book that comes to mind is, "The Fens are sooooo flaaaaaat! That means no phallic objects in the landscape, therefore everyone is emaaaaaaaaasculated!!!1!"

(The second thing that comes to mind is, "WTF, McMullen, this was supposed to be good!")

Uh, I may be misremembering it as sillier than it was, but still.

Date: 2010-08-30 02:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rowdycamels.livejournal.com
Nooooooo not the sexualized geography!!11!!!

Noooooooooo!

I tend to take book recommendations from professors with a large grain of salt for precisely this reason.

Alas!

Well, I sent it to the back of the line of all the books I just got, so I might get to it by Christmas...

Hehehe awwwww. Yeah, I wouldn't rush into that....

March 2023

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 26th, 2025 05:39 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios