Sad-making TV
Apr. 19th, 2009 12:57 pmI watched the latest Bones after hearing good things, and...wow. I didn't think anything would make me actually want to write my pedagogy paper. Huh.
Castle has officially out-Bonesed Bones. Please don't cancel it, ABC!
Castle has officially out-Bonesed Bones. Please don't cancel it, ABC!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 05:34 pm (UTC)I am honestly unsure if you're saying this is a good thing or a bad thing...I really need to find time to watch some Castle. I also saw a few days ago that you can vote on the future of a pile of shows at USA Today's survey (http://daytimeconfidential.com/2009/04/usa-todays-12th-annual-save-our-shows-survey), if you're so inclined.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 08:24 pm (UTC)Good for Castle, bad for Bones. They're both starting from similar concepts, but Castle is already doing better with it than Bones ever did.
I really need to find time to watch some Castle.
You should! It's not amazing or anything, but it's been consistently funny and has some good characters. The Castle/Beckett interaction comes from the same comic noir roots that Maddie and David's on Moonlighting did.
I also saw a few days ago that you can vote on the future of a pile of shows at USA Today's survey, if you're so inclined.
*votes*
no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 02:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-28 03:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 07:58 pm (UTC)Then again, Sweets is my favorite character right now, which tells you something about how low my expectations are for the show this season.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-19 08:27 pm (UTC)Then again, Sweets is my favorite character right now, which tells you something about how low my expectations are for the show this season.
OUCH.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 03:06 am (UTC)Um, why did they wait this long to give us any Sweets character development at all? And can't anyone on this show just have boring parents? I mean, Sweets has been flailing after acceptance for ages, we get it, nobody needs to throw in dead adopted parents to
cheapen itmake it mean more.But yeah, Brennan felt much less like a pod person in this one, at least. Her "Oh! Boo hoo! I wish I could be a romantic and believe in Twu Wuv!" thing in "The Cinderella in the Cardboard" just made me gag.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:19 am (UTC)Yes. Yes, he does. And it is very creepy.
And can't anyone on this show just have boring parents?
FOR REAL, OMG. I think Zack and Cam are the only ones who came from anything resembling a normal family life.
I'm very glad I stopped watching with "Princess and the Pear" so that I didn't have to see Brennan wanting to believe in Twu Wuv.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:50 am (UTC)I mean, Sweets has been flailing after acceptance for ages, we get it
The end was creepy. The Stephen Fry interrogation-room intervention was awesome, though, and so was the, "You mean he's imprinted on us? Like a baby duck?" line.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:06 am (UTC)Her "Oh! Boo hoo! I wish I could be a romantic and believe in Twu Wuv!" thing in "The Cinderella in the Cardboard" just made me gag.
True, but there were some awesome moments at the beginning -- the "Brennan, please say what I am thinking. Brennan, please say what -- YES THANK YOU" stuff that used to happen in the first few seasons.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 03:59 am (UTC)I suppose no more so than Stephen Fry having Booth build him a barbeque pit.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 05:09 am (UTC)My point is, clearly "frowned upon" isn't an issue in this universe.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-20 09:53 pm (UTC)Well, that's certainly true.